The general framework for technology and industry policymaking with a civilizational perspective based on philosophy and ethics of technology with a critical approach

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Philosophical studies in the field of technology and industry show that policyـmaking about the industry cannot be comprehensively written by relying solely on technicalـengineering and operationalـexecutive matters and without paying attention to fundamental philosophical, ethical, cultural and social issues. Especially if the intention is that these policies to be written at a civilizational level. What is now observed is that in the country's industrial progress, there is no attention to the principles and foundations of native civilization and the IslamicـIranian lifestyle; because the intellectual basis is that the industrial system is formed in only one way, and that way is nothing other than what has occurred in developed countries. Given that human is an inseparable part of the industrial system, it is necessary to seriously consider philosophical, cultural, ethical, and social foundations in formulating industrial policies. This is why Islamic teachings and standards must be considered in the compilation of industrial policy documents. The purpose of this research is to consider Islamic ideological and ethical teachings and standards in compilation of policy documents for industry and to provide a general policy framework for industry.  
Methodology: In this research, a libraryـbased method was utilized for data collection. Based on the information obtained from library sources, after describing the perspectives that presented in the philosophy of technology and industry, the Islamic viewpoint regarding the issues surrounding the industry is presented using a deductive and descriptiveـanalytical approach. In some cases, comparisons with Western perspectives are made, and the 
conclusions and outcomes are discussed.
So, in general, it can be said that the approach of this research is qualitative and its method is descriptiveـanalytical, and logicalـargumentative analysis was used to obtain the findings.
Findings: The critical philosophical and ethical principles and standards that proposed, can determine the framework for technological and industrial policy making appropriate to the new Islamic civilization. The findings of this research provide a foundational philosophicalـethical framework for policy recommendations in areas related to the human actors of industry (workers and investors), science and technology concerning industry, the environment and natural resources, popularization of industry and production, capital, industrial products, soft and creative industries, and public culture of work, industry and production.
The researcher has presented policy frameworks in these seven areas, taking into account the three factors of production (labor, capital, tools of production) and their requirements (human actors, general culture, science, environment and natural resources, and popularization of industry), and finally the manufactured product.
Conclusion: The strategies presented as a policy framework are the findings of this research. In the author's opinion, these nine strategies, if implemented, can be a policy framework that is coincident with the outlooks of a modern Islamic civilization.
These nine strategies are: 1. Priority of justice in the distribution of wealth and consumption 2. Priority of workers in all aspects 3. Focus on industries that is according to the system of local and territorial needs and satisfaction 4. Serious prevention of monopolization in various sectors and aspects of the industrial system 5. Priority of environment and resources with a focus on optimization, productivity and clean industries 6. Transition from capitalist privatization to popularization 7. Granting a share to culturalـsocial organizations in industrial management 8. Directing people's capital into production and 9. Popularization of selfـemployment in industries.
If we pay attention to the nine strategies, it can be confirmed that the majority or at least part of the problems and shortcomings in various aspects of industrial and economic systems, including the waste of the rights of industry actors, consumers, etc., environmental pollution, increased liquidity, consumerist culture, class differences (class inequality), etc., are the result of not complying of these nine frameworks

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • قرآن کریم
  • آوینی، سیدمرتضی (1400). توسعه و مبانی تمدن غرب. تهران: واحه.
  • آوینی، سیدمرتضی (1392). آغازی بر یک پایان، نقل‌شده در کتاب غرب‌شناسی. اصفهان: آرما.
  • آذری قمی، احمد (1360). پاسخ به مشکلاتی درزمینة مسائل اقتصادی اسلام. قم: انتشارات دارالعلم.
  • پایا، علی (1386). ملاحظاتی نقادانه دربارۀ دو مفهوم علم دینی و علم بومی. حکمت و فلسفه، 2(3)، 39ـ76. https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2007.6689
  • پایا، علی (1391). تکنولوژی دینی: چیستی و امکان تحقق. روش‌شناسی علوم‌انسانی، 73(18)، 7ـ51. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_182.html
  • پایا، علی (1387). فناوری، فرهنگ و اخلاق. تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات.
  • پیت، جوزف (1393). در باب تکنولوژی؛ مبانی فلسفی تکنولوژی. ترجمۀ مصطفی تقوی. تهران: کتاب آمه.
  • جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1391). مفاتیح الحیاه. چاپ هجدهم. قم: نشر اسراء
  • خوشنویس، یاسر (1387). الگوی اسلامی‌ـ‌ایرانی توسعۀ علم و فناوری، شاخصه‌های مفهومی و پرسش‌های پیش رو، سومین کنفرانس مدیریت تکنولوژی ایران.

https://civilica.com/doc/84306

  • دوسک، وال (1393). درآمدی بر فلسفه تکنولوژی، ترجمۀ مصطفی تقوی. تهران: مؤسسۀ آموزشی و تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی.
  • رضایی سامان کندی، مسعود، شادنوش، نصرالله، و سهرابی، طهمورث (1399). چارچوب سیاست‌گذاری فناوری براساس ارزش‌های اخلاقی اجتماعی؛ مطالعۀ موردی فناوری نانو در صنعت برق و انرژی. پژوهش‌های سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی انرژی، 21(6)، 125ـ166.

http://epprjournal.ir/article_1_892_fa.html

  • زیباکلام، سعید (1385). تعلقات و تقویم دینی علوم، در حسنی، ح، علیپور، م، موحد ابطحی، م.ت، علم دینی، دیدگاه‌ها و ملاحظات، تهران: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه، 107ـ128.
  • صدر، موسی (1379). اقتصاد در مکتب اسلام. چاپ یازدهم. تهران: آوند دانش.
  • عربی، سیدهادی، و زندی، حسین (1396). سیاست‌گذاری اقتصادی از منظر اخلاق فضیلت؛ درس‌هایی برای اقتصاد اسلامی. روش‌شناسی علوم‌انسانی، 90(22)، 7ـ33.

https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1351.html

  • کلینی، محمود بن یعقوب (1365). الکافی. جلد4، چاپ چهارم. تهران: دار الکتب الاسلامیه.
  • گلشنی، مهدی (1384). قرآن و علوم طبیعت. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم‌انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
  • گارودی، روژه (1365). هشدار به زندگان. ترجمۀ علی‌اکبر کسمایی. چاپ دوم. تهران: نشر ویس.
  • میرباقری، سیدمحمدمهدی (1389الف). رابطۀ متقابل فرهنگ و تکنولوژی. قم: فرهنگستان علوم اسلامی.
  • میرباقری، سیدمحمدمهدی (1389ب). نسبت علم و تکنولوژی. قم: فرهنگستان علوم اسلامی.
  • نصر، سیدحسن (1392). اسلام، علم مسلمان و فناوری. ترجمۀ حسین کرمی و مهدی کفایی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه امیرکبیر.
  • ورماس، پیتر، کروس، پیتر، دوپوئل، ایبوون، فرنس، مارتین، و هاوکس، ویبو (1391). رویکردی در فلسفۀ تکنولوژی، ترجمۀ مصطفی تقوی و فرخ کاکایی. تهران: کتاب آمه.
  • هاسمن، دانیل، و مک فرسون، مایکل (1398). تحلیل اقتصادی، فلسفۀ اخلاق و سیاست عمومی. ترجمۀ سیدهادی عربی. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.

References

  • Holy Quran
  • Arabi, H., & Zandi, H. (2017). Economic Policy-Making from the Perspective of Virtue Ethics: Lessons for Islamic Economics. Methodology of Human Sciences, 90(22), 7-33. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_1351.html [In Persian].
  • Avini, M. (2021). Development and Foundations of Western Civilization (11th ed). Tehran, Vaheh [In Persian].
  • Avini, M. (2013). A Beginning of an End. In West Studies. Isfahan, Arma

[In Persian].

  • Azari Qomi, A. (1981). Responses to Problems in Islamic Economic Issues. Qom, Dar al-Ilm Publications [In Persian].
  • Dousek, V. (2014). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology (M. Taghavi, Trans). Tehran, Educational and Research Institute of Defense Industries [In Persian].
  • Elizondo, C. V. (2020). On the Role of Ethics in Shaping Technology Development. HighTech and Innovation Journal, (1)2, 86-100.

https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ_2020_01_02_05

  • Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. London, Routledge.
  • Golshani, M. (2005). The Quran and Natural Sciences. Tehran, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies [In Persian].
  • Garoudi, R. (1986). A Warning to the Living (A. A. Kasmai, Trans; 2nd ed). Tehran, Weis -Publications [In Persian].
  • Hasman, D., & McPherson, M. (2019). Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. (Seyed Hadi Arabi, Trans). Qom, Pazhuheshgah-e Hoze va Daneshgah [In Persian].
  • Javadi-E-Amoli, A. (2012). Keys to Life (18th ed). Qom, Esra Publications [In Persian].
  • Khoshnevis, Y. (2008). Islamic-Iranian Model for the Development of Science and Technology: Conceptual Features and Current Questions. In Third Conference on Technology Management in Iran.

https://civilica.com/doc/84306 [In Persian].

  • Kulleini, M. (1986). Al-Kafi (Vol. 4; 4th ed). Tehran, Darolkotob Al-Islamiyah [In Persian].
  • Mirbagheri, M.M. (2010a). Interrelationship between Culture and Technology. Qom, Academy of Islamic Sciences [In Persian].
  • Mirbagheri, M.M. (2010b). The Relationship between Science and Technology. Qom, Academy of Islamic Sciences [In Persian].
  • Nasr, H. (2013). Islam, Muslim Science, and Technology (H. Karami & M. Kafayi, Trans). Tehran, AmirKabir University Publications [In Persian].
  • Namdarian, L., Sharifzade, R., & Khedmatgozar, H.R. (2022). Ethics in Science and Technology Policy-Making: A Proposed Normative Framework. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 42(4), 117-132.

https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221137307

  • Paya, A. (2007). Critical Observations on the Two Concepts of Religious Science and Indigenous Science. Wisdom and Philosophy, 3(2), 39-76.

https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2007.6689 [In Persian].

  • Paya, A. (2012). Religious Technology: Its Nature and Possibility of Realization. Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 18, (73), 7-51. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_182.html [In Persian].
  • Paya, A. (2008). Technology, Culture, and Ethics. Tehran, Research Institute of Culture, Art and Communication [In Persian].
  • Pitt, J. (2014). On Technology: Philosophical Foundations of Technology (M. Taghavi, Trans). Tehran, Ameh Book [In Persian].
  • Rezaei Saman Kandi, M., Shadnoush, N., & Sohrabi, T. (2020). Framework for Technology Policy Based on Social Ethical Values: A Case Study of Nanotechnology in Electricity and Energy Industry. Energy Policy and Planning Research, 6(21), 125-166.

http://epprjournal.ir/article_1_892_fa.html [In Persian].

  • Sadr, S. M. (2000). Economics in Islamic School (11th ed, Hojjati Kermani, Ed). Tehran, Avand-E-Danesh [In Persian].
  • Vermaas, P., Kroes. P., Poel. I., Franssen. M. & Houkes W. (2013). An Approach in the Philosophy of Technology (M. Taghavi & F. Kakaei, Trans).Tehran, Ame Book [In Persian].
  • Zibakalam, S. (2006). Religiosity and Religious Calendar of Sciences. In S. H. R. Hasani, M. Alipour, M. T. M. Abtahi (Eds.), Religious Science: Perspectives and Considerations (pp. 107-128). Qom, Pazhuheshgah-e Hoze va Daneshgah [In Persian].